Female Tinder usage data was collected and statistically analyzed to determine the inequality in the Tinder economy.It was determined that the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men.The process of matching doctors or students is a little more complex than matching romantic partners since hospitals and schools — unlike most couples — accept many proposals.
Suppose you had a group of men and a group of women who wanted to get married.
Gale and Shapely wanted to see if they could develop a formula to pair everyone off as happily as possible.
In addition to rigorous investigation, discovery is often shaped by serendipity and human curiosity. These happy matches wouldn’t be possible without the work of Roth, Gale and Shapely. The results and impacts are sometimes unpredictable and unexpected — and that’s a big part of what makes it so important.
When Gale and Shapley began, their work was theoretical and abstract.
Their research may have seemed obscure or even pointless, but the insights they gleaned built the foundation for breakthroughs that have improved countless people’s lives.
by Worst-Online-Dater This study was conducted to quantify the Tinder socio-economic prospects for males based on the percentage of females that will “like” them.
Economics is often associated with the idea of money.
But the field extends beyond what can be (or should be) monetized.
He wanted to diagnose matching markets that weren’t working and adapt the Gale-Shapely algorithm to help them work more efficiently.
Roth, with backing from the National Science Foundation, began looking at the National Residency Match Program (NRMP), a system that assigns new doctors to hospitals around the country.
In the 1960s, researchers David Gale and Lloyd Shapley embarked upon research to take up an unlikely subject: matchmaking.